User Forum
Xequte User Forums
Profile    Active Topics    Forum FAQ    Search this forumSearch
     
Forum Tips
» This forum is for users to discuss their software problems and suggestions for improvement.  Remember that only a tiny percentage of our users experience such problems (To be precise less than 0.7% have ever posted on this forum)
» Include your software version number (as displayed in the About Box)
» Check the FAQ before posting as most common questions have already been answered
» You don't need to also e-mail us separately as our support team will respond to all questions on this forum
 
 All Forums
 Xequte User Forums
 MailList King
 Order of Sending

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.

Size 
UserName:
Password:
Mode 
Format  BoldItalicizedUnderline Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailBrowse for an image to attach to your post Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message 

 

Emoji
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Black Eye [B)]
Frown [:(] Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
jpkelly Posted - Nov 15 2010 : 10:55:22
WXP/SP3, MLK 10.02R

Nigel, one of the new features I look for as each update is released is the capability of changing the order in which emails are sent out. The problem I'm trying to prevent is when many emails to the same Domain (Yahoo e.g.) are flagged as suspect or SPAM and are diverted because they arrive in a cluster. I currently stagger my sending to 20 messages every 8 minutes to reduce this possibility but suspect many are being quarantined. I also send via authsmtp.com.

All my mailing lists are small, < 1,000.

If there were a way to 'serialize' staggered sending so only 1 email would go to each Domain in a list and then start over until all messages went out that would be great. Of course, there's always the possibility the last cluster(s) would all be to the same Domain, I understand that.

I've searched the forum for help here but didn't find anything, am I making myself clear?

Jim
3   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
xequte Posted - Nov 18 2010 : 01:34:38
Hi Jim

Fair enough

Nigel
Xequte Software
www.xequte.com
nigel@xequte.com
jpkelly Posted - Nov 15 2010 : 16:08:36
Nigel, thanks for the timely response...good grief...what time is it there in NZ?

Anyway, I've done a little programming over the years and realize how complex an issue this is . . . just wanted to 'plant the seed' so in your future efforts you might wend your way my way . . . <grin>.

Jim
xequte Posted - Nov 15 2010 : 14:31:41
Hi Jim

There is no option for that at present, and its implementation would be fairly elaborate. If your list was biased towards one domain then it would probably even make the problem worse as towards the end of the sending all of the recipients would be of that domain (having been pushed back earlier).

But in principal there is benefit in balancing out the domains so I will consider it further for a future version (or email me if you want to discuss custom development).



Nigel
Xequte Software
www.xequte.com
nigel@xequte.com